In the wake of Donald Trump’s re-election, there has been widespread concern about his administration’s plans to ramp up immigration enforcement, including the possibility of mass deportations. While some dismiss these fears as exaggerated or unlikely, history—and certain federal laws—suggest otherwise. One such law that could potentially be invoked is the Alien Enemies Act, a statute with origins dating back to 1798. 

With the recent election and increasing uncertainty surrounding immigration policies, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is at a critical juncture. As a program created through executive action, DACA is particularly vulnerable to elimination. Former President Trump attempted to end it during his first term, triggering a wave of lawsuits that have now worked their way through the court system. Currently, all eyes are on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, where a decision is expected soon. Here’s what you need to know. 

One of the most concerning immigration enforcement tools is the policy of expedited removal, which allows Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to deport certain individuals without a hearing before an immigration judge. Under Donald Trump’s presidency, the use of expedited removals was significantly expanded, and this trend may continue to affect individuals across the United States, particularly in states like Texas with high immigrant populations. 

The recent decision in Naeem Nizar Ali Momin v. Ur M. Jaddou, et al. highlights a significant issue regarding the jurisdictional limits of U.S. courts in reviewing certain immigration-related decisions, particularly those involving discretionary actions by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). This case emphasizes the challenges faced by immigrants who seek legal recourse when their applications for status adjustments or waivers of inadmissibility are denied. It also sheds light on the broader implications of discretionary decisions made by immigration authorities and the judicial barriers to reviewing such decisions. 

Starting August 19, DHS will accept applications for parole from noncitizen spouses of U.S. citizens who have lived in the U.S. for at least 10 years. If granted, these spouses can apply for lawful permanent residence without leaving the U.S.

The plight of asylum seekers has become a focal point of international humanitarian concern. These individuals, fleeing persecution and violence, seek refuge in safer countries where they hope to rebuild their lives. However, the path to asylum is fraught with legal and humanitarian challenges. This blog will provide an overview of the asylum process, discuss the legal hurdles faced by refugees, and highlight the importance of humanitarian legal assistance.

As the president of the Houston Heights Rotary and a family-based immigration lawyer, I consider it a profound honor and a solemn duty to be entrusted with the care and maintenance of the John H. Reagan WWII Memorial. For the first time this year, our Rotary is hosting a commemorative event at the Memorial, and I am deeply reflecting on the significance of this responsibility.

Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized many industries, including law. From document review to predictive analytics, AI has proven its ability to streamline certain processes and enhance efficiency in legal practice. However, when it comes to the intricate and often emotionally charged field of immigration law, the role of a human immigration attorney cannot be overstated.